Subject: Re: Does the PAM stuff work in 1.5pre8?
From: mikko@fs.sorl.net
Date: Fri Oct 12 2001 - 16:36:23 EDT
You have to manually uncomment the modules (pam & dhx) in
netatalk-pre8etc/uams/Makefile
after having run the ./configure before make.
All the best /Mikko
At 21:39 2001-10-12, you wrote:
>When I start it up, I get these errors:
>
>Oct 12 14:27:14 deepeddy afpd[3398]: uam : Loading
>(/etc/netatalk/uams/uams_clrtxt.so)
>Oct 12 14:27:14 deepeddy afpd[3398]: uam: uam not found (status=-1)
>Oct 12 14:27:14 deepeddy afpd[3398]: uam : Loading
>(/etc/netatalk/uams/uams_dhx.so)
>Oct 12 14:27:14 deepeddy afpd[3398]: uam: uam not found (status=-1)
>
>This is whats in the uams directory:
>lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Oct 12 13:54 uams_clrtxt.so ->
>uams_pam.so
>lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 12 13:54 uams_dhx.so ->
>uams_dhx_pam.so
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9852 Oct 12 13:52 uams_dhx_passwd.so
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 8101 Oct 12 13:52 uams_guest.so
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9341 Oct 12 13:52 uams_passwd.so
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 8394 Oct 12 13:52 uams_pgp.so
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 13650 Oct 12 13:52 uams_randnum.so
>
>When I look at the makefile for the uams, I note that uams_pam.so and
>uams_dhx_pam.so are only built if BUILD_PAM is defined.
>
>configure.in sez:
>
>AM_CONDITIONAL(BUILD_PAM, test x$compile_pam = xyes)
>
>but $compile_pam is never defined...anywhere.
>
>I tried copying the enable-krb4-uam stuff with no success, so I'm stumped.
>
>Chris
>
>--
>Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
>virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com
>4314 Avenue C
>Austin, TX 78751-3709 +1 512 374 0500
>
> My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination. For an
> explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html
>
> The Greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the
> hijacking of morality by religion. However valuable -- even
> necessary -- that may have been in enforcing good behavior on
> primitive peoples, their association is now counterproductive.
> Yet at the very moment when they should be decoupled,
> sanctimonious nitwits are calling for a return to morals based
> on superstition.
> --- Arthur C. Clarke
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 14 2001 - 03:04:55 EDT